W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pfwg@w3.org > March 2014

Re: SVG2 Accessibility User Agent Implementation Guide

From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:57:56 -0500
To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Cc: dschulze@adobe.com, janina@rednote.net, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>, SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF5099E7B9.694DC842-ON86257CA9.00681D16-86257CA9.00682E09@us.ibm.com>

ok. Michael, Please draw up at task force work statement for review.



Rich Schwerdtfeger

From:	Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
To:	Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, dschulze@adobe.com
Cc:	SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>, SVG public list
            <www-svg@w3.org>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats
            <public-pfwg@w3.org>, janina@rednote.net
Date:	03/28/2014 10:49 AM
Subject:	Re: SVG2 Accessibility User Agent Implementation Guide

We can set up a joint task force that allows people from SVG to join the TF
without joining PF. The task force work statement would indicate that the
work product is solely a deliverable of PF and under its patent
obligations. Members from SVG who cannot accept that can decline to join
the TF. Or if they want to formalize that they have accepted putting the
deliverable under the PF patent obligations, they may choose to join PF
even though it's not a requirement from our side to join the task force.

On 28/03/2014 11:41 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:

      Dirk, Michael,

      The SVG working group resolved to have the this document be a PF
      document that would be worked on by a PF/SVG task force run in PF and
      fall under that IP policy. Would this require people who wanted to
      participate from SVG join PF?


      Rich Schwerdtfeger

(image/gif attachment: graycol.gif)

Received on Friday, 28 March 2014 18:58:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:45:01 UTC