Re: PF editors

De nada.  It was pretty straightforward.  I am going to tinker with getting
it to look more like the original as an exercise.  Like the perma-link
tags.  Those are adorable.


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:00 AM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:

> Thanks for tackling this effort Shane. It's really appreciated.
>
> On Mar 26, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
>
> Michael got the github repo set up today.  I started populating it and
> have an initial cut at the aria spec in the spec sub directory.  Still work
> to do, but it is not a bad start for a few hours work.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>wrote:
>
>> I might be late due to weather and traffic delays. Probably 15 min after
>>> the hour like Joseph.
>>>
>>
>> Copy cat. :-)
>>
>> Alas, I'm still confused by DST here in North America and not-DST in
>> Europe.  My other telecon today is based in Europe and starts 1:00pm my
>> time, and not noon as I thought on Mon.  That overlaps exactly with our
>> editors' meeting.  I will miss the editors' meeting.
>>
>> I know it was me who proposed the time, and my apologies for my last
>> minute ditch, but something has to give.
>>
>> In terms of my opinions -- I think ReSpec is the way forward, and git or
>> hg are vast improvements over CVS.  I'm more familar with git and so favour
>> it, and, consequently, I'm in favour of using github as well.
>>
>> But, I realize that will mean some work to convert from the current
>> XSL-based build system.
>>
>> Again, my apologies.
>>
>> --
>> ;;;;joseph.
>>
>>
>> 'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
>> 'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
>>              - J. D. Klaun -
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 12:11:21 UTC