W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pfwg@w3.org > March 2014

Re: PF editors

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:20:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOk_reGUykS0JBPmW++E1787aZiU5hK49Czx8d2Ytx4R32YGcg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>
Michael got the github repo set up today.  I started populating it and have
an initial cut at the aria spec in the spec sub directory.  Still work to
do, but it is not a bad start for a few hours work.


On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>wrote:

> I might be late due to weather and traffic delays. Probably 15 min after
>> the hour like Joseph.
>>
>
> Copy cat. :-)
>
> Alas, I'm still confused by DST here in North America and not-DST in
> Europe.  My other telecon today is based in Europe and starts 1:00pm my
> time, and not noon as I thought on Mon.  That overlaps exactly with our
> editors' meeting.  I will miss the editors' meeting.
>
> I know it was me who proposed the time, and my apologies for my last
> minute ditch, but something has to give.
>
> In terms of my opinions -- I think ReSpec is the way forward, and git or
> hg are vast improvements over CVS.  I'm more familar with git and so favour
> it, and, consequently, I'm in favour of using github as well.
>
> But, I realize that will mean some work to convert from the current
> XSL-based build system.
>
> Again, my apologies.
>
> --
> ;;;;joseph.
>
>
> 'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
> 'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
>              - J. D. Klaun -
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 02:20:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:45:01 UTC