W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pfwg@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Clarification sought regarding aria-setsize and aria-posinset

From: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:31:56 -0400
Message-ID: <531F1E5C.1000000@alum.mit.edu>
To: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Hi Joanie,

Not a complete reply, but the end of your message reminded me of a 
feature in IA2.

You wrote:

> I think what the improvements to ATK (and in turn AT-SPI2) may be is two
> new methods:
> a. get_set_size()
> b. get_position_in_set()
> Seems like that would be a more reliable -- and implementation-agnostic
> -- way for ATs to get the needed information to pass along to end users.
> Related aside: Are the ATs on other platforms having to play a similar
> game of "go fish" when trying to present things like set size and
> position in set?

That's similar to IAccessible2::groupPosition() [1] which retrieves the 
level (think hierarchy), group size, and position in a group.  This is 
how aria-level, aria-setsize, and aria-posinset are exposed using 
MSAA+IA2 [2].

A quick (very!) web search reveals that NVDA (likely) uses it [3].

[2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_group_position
[3] http://community.nvda-project.org/ticket/77


'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
              - J. D. Klaun -
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2014 14:32:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:45:01 UTC