- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:50:52 +0200
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, public-html-admin@w3.org
- CC: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Hi Janina,
On 13/06/2014 16:13 , Janina Sajka wrote:
> However, we do believe there is one section of the candidate LC document
> whose RFC2119 status may need to be changed. Therefore, we are
> requesting that the following section be marked "At Risk" for the LC:
>
> http://htmlwg.org/heartbeat/WD-html5-20140617/dom.html#sec-strong-native-semantics
>
> PF notes that the normative requirements on user agents in this section
> are not tested and believes that they cannot be appropriately
> implemented from the specification alone.
I understand where you are coming from but I feel uncomfortable making
this at risk (which does slate for removal) when it is in fact
implemented, and implemented relatively well to boot!
Looking at these tests:
http://stevefaulkner.github.io/html-mapping-tests/
If you forget about elements that are only in 5.1 (details, dialog) it
actually looks pretty good. Sure enough, there are a few failures, but
they don't look like showstoppers to me. The tests leave me rather
optimistic overall.
Based on this, can you please clarify your concerns regarding
implementability?
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 16 June 2014 14:51:02 UTC