- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:53:28 -0800
- To: "'James Craig'" <jcraig@apple.com>, "'WAI XTech'" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "'W3C WAI Protocols & Formats'" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Ted O'Connor'" <eoconnor@apple.com>, "'David Singer'" <singer@apple.com>
James Craig wrote: > > Even though the term has been in the published working draft for six > months, the editorial note reference of "at-risk" seems to be a primary > objection. Hi James, I just wanted to jump in here to a) say thanks for making this editorial change, and b) I personally felt that you were NOT wrong in pointing out the editorial note in the current draft. While it is/was somewhat unusual to use the language you chose (the new edit is much better), it WAS responsible of you to point it out, and to ensure that there is ongoing discussion around this particular attribute. More than anything else, I think we need to continue talking about this, and your pointing it out has kicked-off that discussion. Also, just in case nobody has said it recently, thanks for your hard work and dedication to the ARIA effort - I for one do appreciate it. Cheers! JF (PS - I hope you find some time to respond to some of my other questions, posted earlier)
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2014 18:54:10 UTC