The test case is invalid as it did not set focus to the item being
selected. If you tab to the item to become selected before the timer goes
off both events fire on the item with focus.
So, is it important that the restriction be applied ( the state change does
not occur on the item with focus)?
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS,
Cc: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>, David Bolter
<dbolter@mozilla.com>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats"
<public-pfwg@w3.org>
Date: 10/28/2013 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: UAIG Test CAse 90, 91, 92 problems on MSAA/IA2
Hi, Rich. I missed what kind of problem here. I tried 90 test case and
after 10secs I can see 'selection remove' event on unselected item.
Thanks.
Alex.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger
<schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> test case:
>
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=90
>
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=91
>
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=92
>
> These are all invalid as nothing has focus. However, If I were to have
focus
> on one of the items getting selected both the state change and the
selection
> change occurs on that element.
> What is the right answer. This is rather important.
>
> test files:
>
>
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pfwg/raw-file/default/ARIA-UAIG/1.0/tests/test-files/test90.html
>
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pfwg/raw-file/default/ARIA-UAIG/1.0/tests/test-files/test91.html
>
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pfwg/raw-file/default/ARIA-UAIG/1.0/tests/test-files/test92.html
>
> Rich
>
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
