Hi Alex,
I am not aware of a problem with AT either. We discussed this on the ARIA
call and we thought the text should be:
EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTION then EVENT_OBJECT_STATECHANGE
as the latter part of the text constradicts this first part.
Would you support that? If so, FF would pass.
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS,
Cc: "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>, David
Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com>
Date: 10/15/2013 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: UAIG Test case 85 failure
Hi, Rich. I filed FF track issue:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Accessibility/ARIA1.0TestSuiteFailures#85.
Can I know background of that wording. It seems I'm not aware of any AT
problems of this kind.
Thanks.
Alex.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
test case: 85:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=85
test file:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pfwg/raw-file/default/ARIA-UAIG/1.0/tests/test-files/test85.html
The state change id following the selection change. Here is the UAIG
spec. text for single selection:
EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTION then EVENT_OBJECT_STATECHANGE on newly focused
item, but arrange events so state change does not occur on focused item,
to avoid extra selection change announcements
Rich Schwerdtfeger
