- From: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:48:53 -0400
- To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
- CC: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, David Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com>
Hi Alex,
> I could misunderstand where the problem is. I thought it is in
> "arrange events so state change does not occur on focused item, to
> avoid extra selection change announcements".
You might be right. I was going by what Rich said in the original email
(my emphasis):
> *The state change id [sic: "is"] following the selection change. Here
> is the UAIG spec. text for single selection:
>
> EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTION then EVENT_OBJECT_STATECHANGE on newly focused
> item*, but arrange events so state change does not occur on focused
> item, to avoid extra selection change announcements
Perhaps both clauses need work.
Rich, what is/are the issues here?
--
;;;;joseph.
'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
- J. D. Klaun -
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 16:49:21 UTC