Response to your comments on Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.0

Dear Matthias Schmitt:

Thank you for your comments on the 18 January 2011 Candidate Recommendation
of Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.0
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-wai-aria-20110118/). The Protocols and
Formats Working Group has reviewed all comments received on the draft. We
would like to know whether we have understood your comments correctly and
whether you are satisfied with our resolutions.

Please review our resolutions for the following comments, and reply to us
by 27 January 2014 to say whether you accept them or to discuss additional
concerns you have with our response. If we do not hear from you by that
date, we will mark your comment as "no response" and close it. If you need
more time to consider your acknowledgement, please let us know. You can
respond by email to public-pfwg-comments@w3.org (be sure to reference our
comment ID so we can track your response). Note that this list is publicly
archived.

Please see below for the text of comments that you submitted and our
resolutions to your comments. Each comment includes a link to the archived
copy of your original comment on
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/.

Note that if you still strongly disagree with our resolution on an issue,
you have the opportunity to file a formal objection (according to 3.3.2 of
the W3C Process, at
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGArchiveMinorityViews)
to public-pfwg-comments@w3.org. Formal objections will be reviewed during
the proposed recommendation transition meeting with the W3C Director,
unless we can come to agreement with you on a resolution in advance of the
meeting.

Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments. Though we cannot
always do exactly what each commenter requests, all of the comments are
valuable to the development of Accessible Rich Internet Applications
(WAI-ARIA) 1.0.

Regards,

Janina Sajka, PFWG Chair
Michael Cooper, PFWG Staff Contact


Comment 388: "rowgroup" role missing?
Date: 2013-02-14
Archived at: UNSET
Relates to: Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 - 5.3. Categorization of Roles <http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-wai-aria-20110118/#roles_categorization>
Status: Accepted proposal

-------------
Your comment:
-------------
I wondered why the "rowgroup" role is missing in the listing of all roles
in "5.3. Categorization of Roles". Could it be, that this should be listed
under "5.3.3. Document Structure"?


--------------------------------
Response from the Working Group:
--------------------------------
We will add it to the Document Structure section.

Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2014 00:24:17 UTC