- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:24:43 +0000
- To: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- CC: PFWG Public Comments <public-pfwg-comments@w3.org>
Dear Steven Pemberton: Thank you for your comments on the 13 December 2012 Proposed Recommendation of Role Attribute (http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-role-attribute-20121213/). The Protocols and Formats Working Group has reviewed all comments received on the draft. Please see below for the text of comments that you submitted and our resolutions to your comments. Each comment includes a link to the archived copy of your original comment on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/, and may also include links to the relevant changes in the Role Attribute editors' draft at %DOCUMENT_EDITORS_URI_DATED%. Regards, Janina Sajka, PFWG Chair Michael Cooper, PFWG Staff Contact Comment 387: Acknowledgements Date: 2013-01-31 Archived at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/2013JanMar/0000.html Relates to: Role Attribute <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-role-attribute-20121213/> Status: Accepted proposal ------------- Your comment: ------------- Between http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xhtml-role-20101216/ and http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-role-attribute-20110113/ my name got dropped from the list of authors (not sure why). If there was a reason, I would appreciate being listed as a previous author in the acknowledgements. -------------------------------- Response from the Working Group: -------------------------------- We apologize for this oversight. Somehow your name was dropped when the document was taken over by the PFWG, but it was clearly erroneous. We have corrected this.
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2013 13:24:49 UTC