- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:41:48 +0000
- To: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- CC: PFWG Public Comments <public-pfwg-comments@w3.org>
Dear Erik Dahlström: Thank you for your comments on the 13 January 2011 Last Call Working Draft of Role Attribute (http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-role-attribute-20110113/). The Protocols and Formats Working Group has reviewed all comments received on the draft. We would like to know whether we have understood your comments correctly and whether you are satisfied with our resolutions. Please review our resolutions for the following comments, and reply to us by 1 August 2011 to say whether you accept them or to discuss additional concerns you have with our response. If we do not hear from you by that date, we will mark your comment as "no response" and close it. If you need more time to consider your acknowledgement, please let us know. You can respond in the following ways: * If you have a W3C account, we request that you respond online at http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/comments/acknowledge?document_version_id=15; * Else, by email to public-pfwg-comments@w3.org (be sure to reference our comment ID so we can track your response). Note that this list is publicly archived. Please see below for the text of comments that you submitted and our resolutions to your comments. Each comment may include links to the relevant changes in the Role Attribute editors' draft at http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/role-attribute/. Note that if you still strongly disagree with our resolution on an issue, you have the opportunity to file a formal objection (according to 3.3.2 of the W3C Process, at http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGArchiveMinorityViews) to public-pfwg-comments@w3.org. Formal objections will be reviewed during the candidate recommendation transition meeting with the W3C Director, unless we can come to agreement with you on a resolution in advance of the meeting. Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments. Though we cannot always do exactly what each commenter requests, all of the comments are valuable to the development of Role Attribute. Regards, Janina Sajka, PFWG Chair Michael Cooper, PFWG Staff Contact Comment 353: Intent for inclusion in SVG Date: 2011-02-02 Archived at: UNSET Relates to: Role Attribute - 2.1 Document Conformance <http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-role-attribute-20110113/#document-conformance> Status: Accepted proposal ------------- Your comment: ------------- "It is intended to be integrated into other host languages such as HTML or XHTML." Note that the 'role' attribute has already been included in SVG Tiny 1.2, see http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/struct.html#RoleAttribute. I think that deserves a mention. -------------------------------- Response from the Working Group: -------------------------------- We have added this reference.
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 16:41:57 UTC