- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:33:16 +0200
- To: public-pfwg-comments@w3.org
I was asked to clarify some points from this comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments/2009AprJun/0005.html The reason the usage of DOM attributes is inconsistent with HTML5 is that there DOM attributes refer to attributes on the interface object. What you call DOM attributes here is what HTML5 calls content attributes. So e.g. http-equiv is a content attribute where as httpEquiv is a DOM attribute. WAI-ARIA does not introduce any DOM attributes. The third bullet point of 2A is not clear because markup languages do not define which attributes and elements need to considered here. I.e. HTML5 does not state that the value of the alt attribute on img elements is non-tooltip native markup. (The alt attribute on the img element is only given as example in WAI-ARIA.) Furthermore, from this requirement it is not clear what the text equivalent of e.g. <input id=x> <label for=x> A <b> B </b> <script> alert("C") </script> </label> is. The overall point is that this algorithm is much too complicated for such a simple task. I'd suggest to start out very simple and maybe increase the scope of the specification later once there is more implementation experience. Also, it seems the requirements here contradict the implementation guide. Why are there two separate specifications with user agent requirements? It would be more helpful if they were in the same document so that such discrepancies can be caught more easily. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2009 18:33:57 UTC