- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:12:09 +0200
- To: "public-pfwg-comments@w3.org" <public-pfwg-comments@w3.org>
Several comments on this section (4.2.6):
1. From the definition it sounds like this section should be titled
"Ancestor element" since the element can be a descendant rather than just
a child.
2. It is not clear to me why SHOULD is used here rather than MUST.
3. The "For example" sentence contains a normative requirement.
4. "contained inside (or owned by)" can simply be "owned by" since that
definition already talks about descendants.
5. "owned by" with the relevant pointer to "owned" should probably be
somewhere in the normative definition.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 11:12:56 UTC