- From: Martin Kliehm <martin.kliehm@bluemars.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:31:29 +0200
- To: public-pfwg-comments@w3.org
The doctype declaration in code examples is often incorrect: sometimes only the exclamation mark in <!DOCTYPE is missing, sometimes the URI. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-aria-state-20060926/#docconf http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-aria-state-20060926/#module_element_xhtml http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-aria-state-20060926/#default_prefix Also the W3C validator does not recognize any new AAA attributes, no matter if they are prefixed or not. Since the validator is indeed capable to handle modular XHTML, I assume there must be an error within the DTD itself. Here is a simple test case with the example from "3.1.1.1.1 The Default Prefix," but without the role attribute (which is used in the example, but not incorporated in the example DTD or namespace) [1][2]. I have tested the State module in combination with the Role Attribute module, and the validator error message is the same as in this simple test case [3][4]. So I suppose the error lies in the namespace module (aaa-qname.mod), alas I couldn't figure out where. Also I have noticed in aaa-qname.mod that there is a suggested different approach when AAA is used together with the Role Attribute module, alas it is unclear how this could be achieved. Since AAA with Role will be a common combination, it would be useful to provide an example in the draft. Best regards, Martin [1] http://www.hateparade.org/aaa-dtd [2] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.hateparade.org/aaa-dtd [3] http://www.hateparade.org/aaa-xdtd [4] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.hateparade.org/aaa-xdtd
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2006 12:31:38 UTC