Re: Cfc: Call for Consensus on our Specification Name

I dont hugely like either but of the two  would vote for A    WAI-ADAPT

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 5:58 PM Lionel Wolberger <lionel@userway.org> wrote:

> Dear Public Personalization Task Force member,
>
> This is a Call for Consensus regarding our Task Force's determination of
> the specification's name. Two names have made it to this final decision.
> Please find below each name, and how it will read as a prefix:module.
>
> Choice (A): WAI-ADAPT.
> Spelled out:
> WAI-ADAPT: Content Module, WAI-ADAPT: Help Module, WAI-ADAPT Tools Module
>
> Choice (B): WAI-APT.
> Spelled out:
> WAI-APT: Content Module, WAI-APT: Help Module, WAI-APT Tools Module
>
> Please note: (A) and (B) are not both abbreviations that need to be
> expanded. No expansion is necessary for ADAPT -- it is just "ADAPT".
>
> We propose a potential possible expansion for either of the above:
> "Adaptable Personalizeable Technologies". This expansion can be applied to
> "APT" or "ADAPT".
>
> Please reply to these two questions:
> 1. Which is your choice for the name of the standard, (A) WAI-ADAPT, (B)
> WAI-APT.
> 2. If your preference is not selected as the majority decision, can you
> live with the other option? Yes/No.  If you answer "No" please explain.
>
> Thank you,
>
> - Lionel
>
>
>
>
> Lionel Wolberger
> COO, UserWay Inc.
> lionel@userway.org
> UserWay.org <http://userway.org/>
> <https://userway.org>[image: text]
>