W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-personalization-tf@w3.org > January 2022

Naming our Spec(s)

From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:42:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFmg2sXp==36H8A2Yd=c8Dd++pA1JC2PQPSeO_RqdcWez+fk3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-personalization-tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>
Hi All,

Coming off of our call today, and I still remain strongly opposed to using
"Adaptation" in our title, for the reasons I've already mentioned.

However, in an attempt to listen carefully and seek some level of
conformance, might I suggest an alternative that looks to capture some of
what others desire. How does everyone feel about

"Adaptable Personalization: <title> Module"

   - Pro: It suggests that the content CAN BE adapted, but that the spec
   does not prescribe how that could or should happen.

   - Con: "Adaptability" for some of our proposed attributes is a bit of a
   stretch in practice.



*John Foliot* |
Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility |
W3C Accessibility Standards Contributor |

"I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." -
Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
Received on Monday, 31 January 2022 16:43:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 31 January 2022 16:43:17 UTC