Naming our Spec(s)

Hi All,

Coming off of our call today, and I still remain strongly opposed to using
"Adaptation" in our title, for the reasons I've already mentioned.

However, in an attempt to listen carefully and seek some level of
conformance, might I suggest an alternative that looks to capture some of
what others desire. How does everyone feel about

"Adaptable Personalization: <title> Module"

   - Pro: It suggests that the content CAN BE adapted, but that the spec
   does not prescribe how that could or should happen.

   - Con: "Adaptability" for some of our proposed attributes is a bit of a
   stretch in practice.


Thoughts?

JF

-- 
*John Foliot* |
Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility |
W3C Accessibility Standards Contributor |

"I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." -
Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"