Re: Possible post-1.0 extension to simplification: not precluding it

This sounds good to me.
One way to ensure we tackle it is to put it as an issue in the git.

On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 2:29 PM Matthew Atkinson <matkinson@tpgi.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Some time back when I was in academia, we did some research on filtering
> documents not only for the level of essentiality of information, but also
> taking into consideration whom the information is for. For example: a
> manager, dev, QA, would have different ideas as to what's essential in a
> given document, so the filtering was not just on the level of importance,
> but also on the audience.
>
> I was wondering if, in future, the group may be interested in extending
> the spec to cater for something like this? That would definitely be
> post-1.0 work, but if we think it's a possibility, is there anything we can
> do now to avoid precluding it as a possibility later?
>
> I have some high-level technical thoughts on how it could be done and what
> we'd need to address now to avoid precluding it later—if the group is
> interested—which I can provide in a follow-up email if you're interested
> and you think it's in scope for this group.
>
> best regards,
>
>
> Matthew
>
> Our original paper on this (which is based on DocBook and I'm not
> suggesting we do it this way in HTML)...
> ACM link (via digital object identifier): <
> https://doi.org/10.1145/1133219.1133222>
> Institutional repository full-text link: <
> https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/conference_contribution/Opening_up_access_to_online_documents_using_essentiality_tracks/9405701?file=17022413
> >
> --
> Matthew Tylee Atkinson
> --
> Senior Accessibility Engineer
> TPG Interactive
> https://www.tpgi.com
> A Vispero Company
> https://www.vispero.com
> --
> This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us
> immediately.
> Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be
> taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited
> and may be unlawful.
>
> --


Lionel Wolberger
COO, UserWay Inc.
lionel@userway.org
UserWay.org <http://userway.org/>
<https://userway.org>[image: text]