- From: Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:32:20 +0000
- To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- CC: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>, public-personalization-tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <7199868F-14D0-4092-9377-8A691D3DCBF4@benetech.org>
I like this John, and Lisa we want to say the Recommendations for Tool Developers and maybe content authors?? Is a Note Track Recommendation. And speaking from experience Note Track Rec's can also take a lot of time so committing to both Module 1 TR and a Note Track Best Practices Guide for Tool Developers / (Content Authors?) is a full plate in my opinion. Mentioning new WD of Modules 2&3 would be fine as well Thanks EOM Charles LaPierre Technical Lead, DIAGRAM and Born Accessible Imageshare Product Manager Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y Skype: charles_lapierre On Jan 4, 2021, at 8:24 AM, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com<mailto:john.foliot@deque.com>> wrote: +1, although I'd be more specific about "develop best practice" - for what, for whom? Personally, I'd rephrase that to focus on "develop best practice for tool vendors" as well as "develop a best practices authoring guide" (for content creators), as I see those two groups (at least) having very different needs and goals. For example, we discussed switching symbol sets on today's call - that would be on the tool vendors to support, not the content authors. As another item for our draft charter: would we (or our TF in tandem with the COGA TF) work on/propose one or more new Success Criteria for WCAG 2.3? (Yes, there will be a WCAG 2.3 - at least, that's where my money is betting - as WCAG 3.0 is still many years out IMHO). Also, if.when our first module is finalized, we could look to ensure that new techniques exist to support WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.4 & SC 1.3.5. While that likely and ultimately is the remit of the AGWG, I see no harm in us crafting and delivering an initial draft to that WG as part of our mandate. Thoughts there? JF On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:02 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com<mailto:lisa1seeman@gmail.com>> wrote: This is what we think we want to do over the next 3 years For coga identified needs: * module 1: pr * module 2: WD Hopely CR if we can * develop best practice (may included user settings) * module 3 : WD Let us know what you think All the best Lisa -- ​John Foliot | Principal Accessibility Specialist Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good deque.com<http://deque.com/> "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
Received on Monday, 4 January 2021 16:32:35 UTC