response to issue #160

Here is a proposed response to issue #160, Consider semantics for accessible route,  https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/160 <https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/160>.

Thanks for your comment. We agree that providing one or more accessible routes through a process is important. We discussed this briefly and agreed that it was beyond the scope of our content module. We plan to examine this more thoroughly in a future personalization module. 


Becky Gibson | Sr. Accessibility Strategist
Knowbility.org
becky@knowbility.org
Pronouns: she/her/hers