- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 20:18:27 -0400
- To: Sharon D Snider <snidersd@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-personalization-tf@w3.org
Awesome, Sharon. 35 should certainly drive the point home! Thanks. Janina Sharon D Snider writes: > In our Personalization task force call today I took on the task to find > symbol sets that could be used as references. I > found the [1]Symbol Set Comparison by Spectronics web page that lists > 35 different symbol sets. Blissymbolics and Mulberry are included and > there are several others we can use if we need more symbol set > examples. > > Regards, > Sharon Snider > IBM Design ► IBM Accessibility Leadership Team > (512)965-3957 > [2]www.ibm.com/able and [3]w3.ibm.com/able > > References > > 1. https://www.spectronics.com.au/article/symbol-set-comparison > 2. https://www.ibm.com/able > 3. https://w3.ibm.com/able -- Janina Sajka https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2021 00:18:41 UTC