- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 09:52:09 -0400
- To: Personalization tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>
Item: Mention who benefits from this specification in the Abstract, preferably in the first one or two sentences. Item: Both Abstract and Intro talk about "unnecessary distractions." This makes no sense, unless one also defines what a necessary distraction is, i.e. why say "unnecessary" at all. Wouldn't "minimize distractions" be more accurate? Item: Statement "The Personalization Semantics Content Module 1.0 is an extension of the personalization semantics introduced in the [1]Personalization Semantics Explainer" is confusing. I think we need the phrase "series of personalization modules," arguably with lower case "personalization." Item: First sentence of Intro plain language check: "is designed to" is too much indirection. Suggest simply saying "enables content authors." Would also intro the phrase "standard based mechanism," or "standard markup approach" Item: Intro first paragraph should also point to AAC. That's what this is all about, right? Item: Plain language "is to enable" ?? Item: "Adaptation of content" ?? Item: "Third para starts: "Personalization semantics is a series of technical specifications." This is a very important point and should be featured up top, i.e. the term "personalization semantics" is being used confusingly, sometimes to mean Module 1, sometimes to mean the series of expected modules. Disambiguate. Item: Grammar: "All the vocabulary in Personalization Semantics Content Module are made of properties and their values. Please see our our [3]Explainer for Personalization Wiki. " might instead be: "The vocabulary in Personalization Semantics Content Module 1 consists of selected properties and their values and is further explained in our [3]Explainer for Personalization Wiki. Item: Grammar: Terms --- This document uses the terms as defined by the COGA task force. See [6]COGA Glossary. ." Might better be something like: "This document uses terms as defined by the COGA task force See in [6]COGA Glossary." -- Janina Sajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Monday, 1 June 2020 13:52:26 UTC