- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:32:12 -0400
- To: Personalization tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>
Minutes of the Personalization Task Force teleconference of 20 July are
provided below as text. They're available as hypertext at:
https://www.w3.org/2020/07/20-personalization-minutes.html
W3C
- DRAFT -
Personalization Task Force Teleconference
20 Jul 2020
Attendees
Present
Roy, becky, JF, CharlesL, LisaSeemanKest, janina, sharon
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
janina
Contents
* Topics
1. Introduction of Content Module
2. timelines - see https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/wish-list-and-priorities-for-2020--2021
3. close issue for internationalization
4. timelines - see https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/wish-list-and-priorities-for-2020--2021
* Summary of Action Items
* Summary of Resolutions
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
<scribe> scribe: janina
Introduction of Content Module
ls: Reviews the action on all to review Intro ...
bg: Confused as to where to look ...
<JF> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/JF-Edits/content/index.html#introduction
<LisaSeemanKest> https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/content/
ls: believe it's same as github
js: Not what we responded on list?
ls: No, that was I18N response, which is now agreed
js: Asks what's changed since last week
jf: Wants to address a Lisa comment ....
... Notes all we've done is element level attributes; I checked all three modules
ls: thought module 2 not resolved; and module 3 much more to consider
... I'm unsure we should publish Module 1 until we determine whether we will limit ourselves to element only across all our modules
... Not sure we should resolve this ahead of Module 1 publication
bg: Believe reviewed when last posted ...
ls: thought we would consider to make it more stand alone given Explainer changes?
... Started rewrite suggestions in email, first smallish, then an Abstgract rewrite
... We don't mention enough
... believe we had curb cut value
... also thought Abstract should say something general about Personalization as a whole
jf: Did read this morning and not agreeing ... seems a focus on symbols
... Believes we're broader than icons and symbols
ls: Not sure you're looking at the right place?
jf: email at 7:04 Central
<Zakim> janina, you wanted to say Abstract is not the place to enumerate details or speculative future
ls: Seems both jf and I agree it's not general enough
jf: Symbols and AAC is just one sixth of this module; even if the more used
... We're missing the machine readable impact of this spec
ls: AT the require context to be machine readable
<LisaSeemanKest> it support user agents that requires context to be macien readable
jf: almost spider-bait for AI
bg: are we going to have AI examples?
ls: we want to go a bit further from symbols/icons and AAC
... Next step I should take another pass?
<LisaSeemanKest> ACTION: lisa next version of abstract
<trackbot> Created ACTION-67 - Next version of abstract [on Lisa Seeman-Kestenbaum - due 2020-07-27].
timelines - see https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/wish-list-and-priorities-for-2020--2021
close issue for internationalization
timelines - see https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/wish-list-and-priorities-for-2020--2021
<LisaSeemanKest> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/wish-list-and-priorities-for-2020--2021
ls: first bullet is done
jf: yes and no
ls: Add Editor's Note re prefix
jf: do we really want to ask for prefix?
ls: OK, let me amend to be whatever the path forward
jf: rather start with premise we're only using data- because we were told to
... prefers mainstreaming these prefixes
<Zakim> janina, you wanted to discuss pros and cons
<JF> +1 to a much larger discussion, but also +1 to Janina - we need to move quickly on this
<JF> W3C/WHAT WG on data-* https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/dom.html#embedding-custom-non-visible-data-with-the-data-*-attributes
<LisaSeemanKest> ACTION: lisa draft an issu on prefex or not prefix
<trackbot> Created ACTION-68 - Draft an issu on prefex or not prefix [on Lisa Seeman-Kestenbaum - due 2020-07-27].
[discussion of steps to get to CR]
ls: discusses moving forward to other work while waiting for data- resolution in wicg and what-wg
... our current link is to a draft which will be deleted; need changed to permanent
<Roy> http://w3c.github.io/coga/glossary
roy: glossary merged into COGA master; I can fix
<LisaSeemanKest> ACTION: becky check what is missing in the tr space explainer from the wiki
<trackbot> Created ACTION-69 - Check what is missing in the tr space explainer from the wiki [on Becky Gibson - due 2020-07-27].
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: becky check what is missing in the tr space explainer from the wiki
[NEW] ACTION: lisa draft an issu on prefex or not prefix
[NEW] ACTION: lisa next version of abstract
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Present: Roy becky JF CharlesL LisaSeemanKest janina sharon
Found Scribe: janina
Found Date: 20 Jul 2020
People with action items: becky lisa
--
Janina Sajka
https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka
Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Monday, 20 July 2020 15:32:26 UTC