Re: Clarification on action item

I think thats correct but if we have any other items we discussed as options we need to explain why we chose not to go with that option.  I believe the use of aui-* is something we should mention and we decided not to go with that for a few reasons, primarily there was conflict with that, and it was recommended for us to use data- during our TPAC 2018 Personalization Plenary Day presentation if memory servers.


Thanks
EOM
Charles LaPierre
Technical Lead, DIAGRAM and Born Accessible
Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y
Skype: charles_lapierre


On Jan 10, 2020, at 6:46 AM, Becky Gibson <becky@knowbility.org<mailto:becky@knowbility.org>> wrote:

ACTION: becky make draft of impelemtion options to be an appandenix in the requirments doc (draft can be in a new page in the wiki)
... we want to take discussion and previous explorations that are in the wiki now, with the goal to add it to the final document. But we can do the editorial clean-up in the wiki for now

I just want to clarify my action item from the January 6 meeting.  I believe I just need to provide an overview of the alternatives we proposed for the Vocabulary and summarize how we arrived at the use of data dash.  Is this correct? I believe that since we are not working on the module that includes symbols, that discussion is not included in this action?

thanks,
-becky