- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:09:22 -0500
- To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>, public-personalization-tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>, RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>
On 1/7/20 12:27 PM, John Foliot wrote: > I'm thinking more along the lines of what Gregg Vanderheiden is > pursuing with GPII <https://gpii.net> and more specifically > https://gpii.net/content/auto-personalization & > https://gpii.net/content/private-preference-permission-system. > > Manu, does that make sense? It does make sense for both use cases. One of the powerful things about Verifiable Credentials is that you can use them for machine-to-machine interaction directly... and that machine-to-machine communication can then surface a11y requirements to another human or organization. See Use Case H.5: https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-use-cases/#healthcare Embarrassingly the *only* accessibility use case we have in our use cases document. ... but, yes, you could use Verifiable Credentials for auto-personalization, or to prove to a service provider that you are legally entitled to the service due to accessibility needs. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2020 18:09:27 UTC