- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:25:34 -0500
- To: public-personalization-tf@w3.org
<begin draft> Dear Alice: Thank you for raising Issue #476[1] asking about duplication between Distraction in our Module 1 specification draft and CSS' Media Queries 5. We have spent a good deal of time considering this in our past several teleconferences[2][3] and have come to the following conclusions: * While there is some overlap distraction is much more * comprehensive than MQ5. However, our examples have inadvertently * focussed on the overlap, not the broader scope supported in our * specification. We are creating new examples to remedy this. * We have decided nto let the overlap stand for now rather than to * try and split out the items covered in MQ5. As this is all new * technology, we feel this is more appropriate at this stage. * Let's see how devedlopers and content authors apply both our * spec and MQ5. Thanks again for bringing this overlap to our attention. We had not previously addressed it in our conversations, and we do need to be aware of the overlap and prepared to respond substantively when questions like yours come up. Best, Lisa and Sharon Personalization TF Facilitators [1] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/476 [2] https://www.w3.org/2020/11/30-personalization-minutes.html [3] https://www.w3.org/2020/12/07-personalization-minutes.html <end draft> -- Janina Sajka https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Monday, 14 December 2020 14:25:50 UTC