- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:53:44 +0200
- To: public-personalization-tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxxDR+edOdLxAsVug+teP_PS0JFm3RBBrQ7kjVE-AO5+fw@mail.gmail.com>
Relevant Minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/10/22-WebPlat-minutes.html#item04 https://www.w3.org/2018/10/24-personalization-minutes Web Plat meeting: - Web Plat guidance is to likely for us ask for 1-3 new attributes - They would like to see the taxonomies slightly more mature (we should do a concatenated version as well) - Terence Eden: HM Gov (UK) are keen to help on this. (Spoke with Terrence Thursday - will forward meeting agenda/invite for our next call to him) - Don't go for a micro-syntax. - *Avoid AUI-* attributes.* Concerns because there is a CSS vendor that already uses that prefix, my (Brian Kardell) company also uses it, probably others. - Suggest not prefixing it - there are multiple use cases outside the personalisation semantics. Siloing it into accessibility will actually reduce uptake in useful scenarios. Plenary Day Presentation: - Correlation with Web Publishing (Ivan Herman) - we should follow up. They too are interested in a general purpose attribute (purpose=""). - The role of Web Annotations in crowd-sourced augmentation should be investigated (idioms and expressions - also think about "slang") - Q: do we have a longer-range vision statement? Where? Role of machine learning and AI? - Concern around "name" (comments about "personalization" such as "change my font size and remember it" in i.e. Captions) - Some people in the captions world worry about the change of subtitle text. Different constituents have different views on how it should work. *It also has privacy impacts, in case of JavaScript access to that type of personalization.* - We are going to (we should) ask for a TAG review JF -- *John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good deque.com
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2018 08:54:49 UTC