Re: survey for personlization

I wasn’t sure if I could work on the survey again after submitting so here are my thoughts on the first 10:

active
 needs a definition. What is the intent?

chunks -breaks the content up in to smaller secions with a single topic per section.
  I think chunks is an odd word but I don’t have a better suggestion. Do people feel that this word is well understood?

easylang -provides a rewrite of the content using short sentences and simple language.
  I think we need to provide a more concrete definition of short sentences and simple language.  A quick proposal: Uses sentences with fewer than XX words and uses only word of 3(?) syllables or less. 

explain -provides a more detailed description of a process or term.
  Should we require this in simple language? 

extrahelp -additional information about the current action or process in one or more formats.
  we should list the other acceptable formats - phone conversation, online chat, easylang version, more details, etc.

feedback - provides and identifies immediate information about any action that occurs.
  I think we need to specify what type of feedback is acceptable; easylang, numberfree, ???, etc.

largefont
  Needs a definition - what is large?  Isn’t this already covered by WCAG? 
 
lessoptions -provide fewer choices by combining related choices together
  authors are going to need examples on how best to achieve this. Will it require additional inputs to get the same level of granularity? I’m not exactly sure how to accomplish this?  Given a airline booking rather than providing for flight selections within two hour windows the site could provide 4 - morning, afternoon, evening, night. But, the consequence of that is the user now has to look through more flight options.  Has this really helped?

literal -provide the literal translation of existing casual language or idioms
  okay - provide examples

numberfree -provides a version of the content that does not use numbers.
  okay - provide examples

-beckyk

> On Jun 22, 2018, at 8:37 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Personalization task forse
> 
> I am reminding everyone about the survey at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/101569/mod2alternative/ <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/101569/mod2alternative/>
> 
> If there are any new terms that we think might be needed to describe alternative content  - now is the right time to suggest them!
> 
> I am CCing EA Jan and Shari  - it would be really good to have your comments as well. This is for terms to discribe wht support is availible in the content to help people find the version they need. We will probably augment the webscheam vocabulary <https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Accessibility> as well, so it is worth looking at the too together.
> 
> All the best
> 
> Lisa Seeman
> 
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
> 
> 
>