Re: Implementations in vocabularies (was RE: Personalization TF Call Today Monday 7/9/18)

I have opened the following issue:

https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/84

Best,
Thaddeus

On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 7:50 AM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

> Responding briefly to the first agendum:
>
>
>
> *From:* Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
>
> 1. We would like to take a first pass at the implementations in
> vocabularies and check we have all the information we need to move forward.
> See the comparison document
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fpersonalization-semantics%2Fwiki%2FComparison-of-ways-to-use-vocabulary-in-content&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Cc525f99f19f2464fd50708d5e5a650ca%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636667424844596180&sdata=IhRgVnPWVZBN622v0q5q98gzsKSNcsXwHcbHIl6CI%2BI%3D&reserved=0> Micheal
> started and we are all asked to comment and see what may be missing.
>
>
>
>
> *[Jason] The only omission that immediately comes to mind is Web
> Annotation. The other implementation languages all assume that the metadata
> are included in the markup of the web page, but Web Annotation does not. A
> tool (e.g., custom user agent, proxy, browser extension) could maintain a
> list of trusted annotation providers, and match each page that the user
> accesses with a list of URIs of pages for which annotations are available.*
>
>
>
> I don’t know how strong a use case this is, but it shouldn’t be overlooked
> altogether either.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>