Re: reorganized the vocabulary list

Hi Charles,

在 2018/12/20 下午10:23, Charles LaPierre 写道:
> Hello Roy,
> This looks really good, however I did find two issues.
> 1.
> Step (from Step Indicator Usage) numeric
>
> *Description*: The stepindicator defined values should be used 
> whenever there is a sequence of tasks that the user is required to 
> complete, so that users who have memory issues can keep track of the 
> steps previously completed.
>
> This does not match the others above (missing space before 
> Description, and orange text of main Text element.
For the orange text, it is the W3C specification stylesheet for code,  I 
used the <code></code> to mark up other vocabularies, but for Step 
indicator, this is not a specific vocabulary, so I am not sure if we 
still use the <code> to mark up?
For space, I will fix.
>
> 2. All the “More info” links do not tell where the user will be taken 
> and thus fails
> *2.4.4 
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/#navigation-mechanisms-refs> Link 
> Purpose (In Context):* The purpose of each link 
> <https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-refs.html#linkpurposedef> can 
> be determined from the link text alone or from the link text together 
> with its programmatically determined link context 
> <https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-refs.html#pdlinkcontextdef>, 
> except where the purpose of the link would be ambiguous to users in 
> general 
> <https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-refs.html#ambiguouslinkdef>. 
> (Level A)
>
>
> We should instead say something like “See definition of numberfree in 
> module 'Personalization Help and Support’”
> Or something like that.  Suggestions welcome on what that text should say.
Sorry for forgetting this point, I think your proposal sentence is good 
choose. I will fix.

Best,

Roy
>
> Thanks
> EOM
> Charles LaPierre
> Technical Lead, DIAGRAM and Born Accessible
> Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y
> Skype: charles_lapierre
> Phone: 650-600-3301
>
>> On Dec 20, 2018, at 2:24 AM, Roy Ran <ran@w3.org <mailto:ran@w3.org>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I updated the Vocabulary list doc [1], and reorganized the vocabulary 
>> according to our Monday meeting. Please review it, thank you.
>>
>> [1] 
>> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/value-list/vocabulary-list/index.html
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Roy
>