- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:55:22 +0300
- To: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Cc: "public-personalization-tf" <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2018 15:56:31 UTC
Hi JoanieIt was all in one category but we ran into implementation problems because they are handled differently depending what they are. Another example of why we need some implementation as we go. All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:48:23 +0300 Joanmarie Diggs<jdiggs@igalia.com> wrote ---- Hey all. Given recent discussions about how to implement Personalization Semantics, I figured I'd give extension writing a try as a proof of concept. As part of this, I of course had to dive into your spec. Question for your consideration: What are the benefits in making the distinction between an action and a destination? I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that it doesn't buy you anything, that it may lead to author confusion, and that implementation might be simplified if this distinction were nixed. If you decide to keep the distinction, then I think you might wish to consider prioritizing clarifying actions versus destinations. I already filed a github issue with more details. Just pointing out the issue here in case most of you aren't monitoring github issues. https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/66 Looking forward to your answers. Thanks! --joanie
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2018 15:56:31 UTC