Re: Personalization Task Force Survey on Priorities and Implementations of our semantic properties from lisa.seeman on 2017-10-13 (public-personalization-tf@w3.org from October 2017)

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:27:31 +0300
To: Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>, "Thad C" <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>, "McSorley" <jan.mcsorley@pearson.com>, "Butler" <shari.butler@pearson.com>, "martin" <martin@texthelp.com>
Cc: "Personalization TF" <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>, "Klaus Miesenberger" <klaus.miesenberger@jku.at>, "Peter Heumader" <peter.heumader@jku.at>, "Ruoyi Zhou" <ruoyi@us.ibm.com>, "scottw1" <scottw1@us.ibm.com>, "andrew.lahart" <andrew.lahart@us.ibm.com>, "ClintC" <clintc@microsoft.com>
Message-Id: <15f15465449.12465e4bc2849.8971836632309098366@zoho.com>

Hi Folks


Charles just sent a survey out to the personization task force so that we know what semantics we need to focus on. 

When filling in this survey  it will be really helpful if you mark any potential implementations that you may know of. If there are implementations being worked on then we will want to keep the semantics in the first version. (For that resion I am sending it to a few people outside the taskforce who may know of more implementations. )


The survey deadline  before Mondays meeting  which will help us prioritize what will stay in this initial release of our Semantics module and what may have to be pushed out to a future release .


(As Charles wrote , for each of the 15 semantic properties we have identified in our Personalization Semantics 1.0 specification we are asking the following two questions:
Do we want to deprioritize this and add an editor’s note explaining our decision?
Do you know of any intended implementations?  )





 Regards
 Lisa and Charles

Received on Friday, 13 October 2017 10:28:13 UTC