Re: proposal for braking up the specification into modules

+1 to the approach. As you allude to in your example, I would need to see
an example to vote on the solidified implementation of the approach.

Best,
Thaddeus

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:51 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> Joanie  made  a proposal to make, the goal of which is to ensure that
> Personalization Semantics becomes a W3C Recommendation: Break up what is
> in your current spec into phases to address groups of related
> properties. One grouping I came up with just as an example for
> discussion is:
>
> 1. Personalized Content
> 2. Personalized Help and support
> 3. Personalized Tools
>
>  think it will also make it easier to
> get the spec through the Rec track.
>
> "Content" includes things users need to understand what's on the screen
> by ensuring it is familiar, understandable, and relevant:
> * coga-action
> * coga-destination
> * coga-field
> * coga-simplification
> * coga-distraction
> * coga-symbol
>
>
> "Help and support" includes additional resources about content:
> coga-literal
> * coga-numberfree
> * coga-easylang
> * coga-alternative
> * coga-explain
> * coga-feedback
> * coga-moreinfo
> * coga-extrahelp
> * coga-helptype
>
> "Tools" includes additional resources for keeping track of progress
> within content:
> * All the log properties
> * All the message properties
>
>
> Roy is making an example version for us to review. Is there any objection
> to this direction?
>
> All the best
>
> lisa
>
>