Re: Payment Request API 1.0 and Payment Method Identifiers are Recommendations

Sorry Stephen - didn't mean to exclude you from the encomium. I was so
focused on not missing the former editors that I missed the person doing
much of the work right now.

Thanks for the prompt, Rouslan.

N

On Fri, 9 Sept 2022, 2:12 pm Rouslan Solomakhin, <rouslan@google.com> wrote:

> Great work, everyone! From Google side, Stephen has been primarily driving
> this process, so I would like to thank him too!
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 6:04 AM Nick Telford-Reed (w3c)
> <w3@stormglass.consulting> wrote:
>
>> Great news! Thanks to the whole group for your long labours on this - and
>> particular thanks to the current (Rouslan, Marcos) and former (Zach,
>> Domenic, Danyao, Adrian, Roy in bcc) editors for getting us to this point.
>> I'd also like to thank Ian, Adrian, Gerard and Praveena. Here's to the next
>> version of the spec, and to widespread adoption!
>>
>> Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver next week.
>> Nick
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 15:52, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Web Payments Working Group,
>>>
>>> Today W3C published Recommendations for Payment Request 1.0 and Payment
>>> Method Identifiers:
>>>    https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/9672
>>>
>>> For more on the history of W3C Member reviews of Payment Request, Formal
>>> Objections, and
>>> the Director’s decision, please see:
>>>   https://www.w3.org/2021/12/prapi-objs.html
>>>
>>> Congratulations to the Working Group and many thanks to the Editors for
>>> all of their work on these
>>> specifications.
>>>
>>> Ian
>>> --
>>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
>>> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
>>> Tel: +1 917 450 8783 <(917)%20450-8783>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>