- From: Stephen McGruer <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:17:15 -0800
- To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/pull/260/review/863855462@github.com>
@stephenmcgruer approved this pull request. LGTM. One optional note. > +## Overview of Click-to-Pay Flow + +* During an enrollment phase, the user registers a card with an SRC System; thus the SRC System has a relationship and uses cookies to recognize returning users. +* At transaction time, the user pushes the Click-to-Pay button on a merchant site. This is typically provided by another party, the SRC Initiator (SRC-I), in a 3p context. +* The SRC-I interacts with each SRC system (by dispatching SRC system cookies to their servers) to establish whether this is a returning user, and if so, to retrieve registered cards. +* The SRC-I aggregates the responses into a candidate card list (i.e., cards registered in SRC systems under that user identity). +* The SRC-I displays the list of cards to the user for selection. +* (The rest of the flow happens, but it is not essential to understanding the problem statement.) + +## Expected Impact + +The desired user experience is that the user pushes the Click-to-Pay button and is presented with a list of registered cards. + +This experience today relies on user recognition by SRC systems +in a third-party context. If third-party cookies are unavailable, an +SRC system will not be able to recognize the user across different Unless the merchant is collaborating and storing a 1p cookie after a successful use of click to pay, the 'across different merchant sites' bit **doesn't matter**. What matters is the SRC systems themselves, which are always 3p - even if the merchant and SRC-I is the same every time. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/pull/260#pullrequestreview-863855462 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/webpayments/pull/260/review/863855462@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2022 17:17:27 UTC