Reminder of 14 January end date [Was: Extension [Re: Call for Consensus to Publish Payment Request API and Payment Method Identifiers as Recommendations - reply requested before 11 January 2022]]

Hi all,

I just wanted to draw attention to this Call for Consensus (ending 14 January at 17h00 UTC) and look forward to hearing from you.

Ian

> On Jan 6, 2022, at 6:45 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Web Payments Working Group,
> 
> We have scheduled an extra meeting on 13 January [1] related to this topic. We are therefore
> extending the CfC to 14 January at 17h00 UTC.
> 
> for the co-Chairs,
> Ian Jacobs
> 
> 
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2022Jan/0002.html
> 
>> On Jan 4, 2022, at 8:04 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
>> 
>> This is a Call for Consensus to publish the following specifications as W3C Recommendations:
>> 
>> Payment Request API
>> https://w3c.github.io/payment-request/
>> 
>> Payment Method Identifiers
>> https://w3c.github.io/payment-method-id/
>> 
>> We would like to thank the editors for preparing these documents.
>> 
>> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 11 January 2022 (17h00 UTC).
>> 
>> For the co-Chairs,
>> Ian Jacobs
>> 
>> ===========================================
>> BACKGROUND
>> 
>> On 30 September 2021 the Director invited W3C Member review of
>> Proposed Recommendations of Payment Request API and Payment Method
>> Identifier. The review resulted in two Formal Objections to Payment
>> Request. The Editors made some non-substantive changes to the
>> specification to satisfy aspects of one of the Formal Objections (see
>> below).
>> 
>> The Editors prepared a public record of the Formal Objections:
>> 
>> Advisory Committee Review of Payment Request API and
>> Payment Method Identifiers 
>> https://www.w3.org/2021/12/prapi-objs.html
>> 
>> We ask that the Working Group review the document and annotations
>> regarding the Formal Objections. This is a proposal to request that
>> the Director advance the specifications to Recommendation (per W3C
>> Process [1]).
>> 
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#transition-reqs
>> 
>> ===========================================
>> CHANGES TO PAYMENT REQUEST API
>> (Since the 30 September 2021 Proposed Recommendation)
>> 
>> * Changes to address aspects of one Formal Objection:
>> https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/pull/978
>> 
>> * Informative changes to satisfy concerns raised by the
>> Internationalization Working Group.
>> https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/pull/971
>> 
>> * An informative change due to a change in terminology in the 
>> URL specification:
>> https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/969
>> 
>> * A small number of editorial changes to fix bugs.
>> 
>> For the full commit history, see:
>> https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/commits/gh-pages
>> 
>> ===========================================
>> PROPOSAL
>> 
>> That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director override the two Formal Objections and approve publication of Payment Request API and Payment Method Identifiers as Recommendations.
>> 
>> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
>> 
>> 1. Support the proposal.
>> 
>> 2. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
>> 
>> 3. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group.
>> 
>> 4. Abstain.
>> 
>> Rationale welcome in your response.
>> 
>> If there is consensus by 11 January 2022 (17h00 UTC) for the proposal, it will carry.
>> 
>> ===========================================
>> FORMAL OBJECTIONS
>> 
>> * If you wish your LACK of support to publish to be conveyed to the
>> Director and reviewed, please include the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION"
>> in your response and be sure to include substantive arguments or
>> rationale. The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and
>> therefore they typically require significant time and effort to
>> address.
>> 
>> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection.
>> 
>> * If there are new Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
>> individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that
>> would address the concern and increase consensus to publish.
>> 
>> For more information, see:
>> https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#Consensus
>> 
>> ===========================================
>> NEXT STEPS
>> Transition Request Following a Working Group Decision to Publish
>> 
>> * In the case where this Call for Consensus results in a decision to
>> publish, the Chairs plan to request approval from the W3C Director
>> to publish Recommendations (including review of any Formal
>> Objections).
>> 
>> --
>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
>> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
>> Tel: +1 917 450 8783
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 917 450 8783
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel: +1 917 450 8783

Received on Thursday, 13 January 2022 17:45:34 UTC