Re: Call for Consensus to publish Payment Request API as a Proposed Recommendation - reply requested before 27 January

1. Support the proposal

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:00 PM Danyao Wang <danyao@google.com> wrote:

> 1. Support the proposal
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:01 AM Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
>>
>> This is a Call for Consensus to publish Payment Request API as a Proposed
>> Recommendation:
>>
>>  Payment Request API
>>  https://w3c.github.io/payment-request/
>>  (Specific GitHub snapshot [1])
>>
>> If you are a Working Group participant who supports the proposal, please
>> reply with an email to on this thread list that says "1. Support the
>> proposal.” We prefer explicit support to silence.
>>
>> We would like to thank the editors for preparing these documents.
>>
>> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 27 January 2021 (17h00 UTC).
>>
>> For the co-Chairs,
>> Ian Jacobs
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/tree/137af6bbfa807f449e15b454cb4d4fb81e94703c
>>
>> ===========================================
>> PROPOSAL
>>
>> That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director approve
>> publication of Payment Request API as a Proposed Recommendation. The
>> specification has not changed since publication as a Candidate
>> Recommendation [1] in December 2020.
>>
>> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
>>
>> 1. Support the proposal.
>>
>> 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even if suggested
>> changes are not taken into account.
>>
>> 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal unless the
>> changes are taken into account.
>>
>> 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
>>
>> 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group.
>>
>> 6. Abstain.
>>
>> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
>>
>> If there is strong consensus by 27 January 2021 (17h00 UTC) for the
>> proposal, it will carry.
>>
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-payment-request-20201203/
>>
>> ===========================================
>> FORMAL OBJECTIONS
>>
>> * If you wish your LACK of support to publish to be conveyed to the
>> Director and reviewed, please include the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION” in your
>> response and be sure to include substantive arguments or rationale. The W3C
>> Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore they typically
>> require significant time and effort to address.
>>
>> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection.
>>
>> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
>> individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that would
>> address the concern and increase consensus to publish.
>>
>> For more information, see:
>> https://www.w3.org/2020/Process-20200915/#Consensus
>>
>> ===========================================
>> NEXT STEPS
>>
>> * In the case where this Call for Consensus results in a decision to
>> publish, the Chairs will request approval from the W3C Director to publish
>> the Proposed Recommendation (including review of any Formal Objections).
>>
>> * See the optimistic timeline to Recommendation:
>> https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/wiki/REC_2020_Plan
>>
>> --
>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
>> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
>> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 <(718)%20260-9447>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Received on Thursday, 21 January 2021 23:07:45 UTC