Re: Call for Consensus to Request Formal Review of WPWG Charter - Review Requested by 9 September

1. Support the proposal.

On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 15:42, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
>
> The Web Payments Working Group's charter [1] expires 31 December 2021. We
> discussed a draft charter at a recent Working Group call.
> This is a Call for Consensus to request that the W3C Director submit the
> following charter for formal review by the W3C Membership:
>     https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-2021.html
>
> The structure is sufficiently different from the previous charter that a
> “diff” view is not useful. However, the charter is short!
> Here are highlights of the changes:
>
> * New scope section
> * Added Secure Payment Confirmation on the Rec Track
> * Section 2.2 sets expectations about other deliverable maintenance
>
> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 9 September 2021 (10am ET).
>
> For more information on the schedule of rechartering, see:
>  https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Recharter-2021
>
> For the co-Chairs,
> Ian Jacobs
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201912.html
>
> =========
> PROPOSAL
>
> That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director submit
> this revised Web Payments Working Group charter for formal review by the
> W3C Membership:
>   https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-2021.html
>
> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
>
> 1. Support the proposal.
>
> 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even if suggested
> changes are not taken into account.
>
> 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal unless the
> changes are taken into account.
>
> 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
>
> 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group.
>
> 6. Abstain.
>
> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
>
> If there is strong consensus by 9 September 2021 (10am ET) for the
> proposal, it will carry.
>
> ==========================
> Formal Objections
>
> * If you wish your LACK of support to publish to be conveyed to the
> Director and reviewed, please include the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" in your
> response and be sure to include substantive arguments or rationale. The W3C
> Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore they typically
> require significant time and effort to address.
>
> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection.
>
> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
> individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that would
> address the concern and increase consensus to publish.
>
> For more information, see:
>   https://www.w3.org/2020/Process-20200915/#Consensus
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 <+1%20718-260-9447>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
smcgruer • he / him