- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@fynbos.dev>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:34:00 +0200
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: Web Payments Working Group <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK7GZxNCrd0LF7xdgEYa999FpH=acEtBECKsHv5AGT8dFtn-1w@mail.gmail.com>
1. Support the proposal. On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 4:30 PM Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > Dear Web Payments Working Group, > > The Basic Card Specification [1] suffers from several issues: > > - It is only implemented in Chrome today, and Google is planning to remove > support. > - It does not have built-in a mechanism for incremental requests for > address components creating privacy concerns [2]. > - There has been little adoption by merchants. > - For security reasons, as we have long discussed, there is a preference > not to circulate “raw” card information on the network. > > This is a Call for Consensus to deprecate Payment Method: Basic Card [1]. > The impact of deprecation will be: > > 1) To republish the document with clear signals that it should no longer > be implemented or used. > 2) The Working Group will no longer maintain the "Card Network > Identifiers Approved for use with Payment Request API”. > 3) The ‘basic-card’ standardized Payment Method Identifier will be > removed from the registry of identifiers [4]. > > PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 26 August 2021 (14h00 UTC). > > For example, if you support the proposal, respond to this list with "1. > Support the proposal.” > > For the co-Chairs, > Ian Jacobs > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/payment-method-basic-card/ > [2] https://github.com/w3c/payment-method-basic-card/issues/72 > [3] https://www.w3.org/Payments/card-network-ids > [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/payment-method-id/#registry > > =========================================== > PROPOSAL > > That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director > deprecate the Payment Method: Basic Card Note. > > Please indicate one of the following in your response: > > 1. Support the proposal. > > 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even if suggested > changes are not taken into account. > > 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal unless the > changes are taken into account. > > 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale). > > 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group. > > 6. Abstain. > > =========================================== > FORMAL OBJECTIONS > > * If you wish your LACK of support to publish to be conveyed to the > Director and reviewed, please include the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" > in your response and be sure to include substantive arguments or > rationale. > > * The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore > they typically require significant time and effort to > address. > > * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection. > > * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the > individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that > would address the concern and increase consensus. > > For more information, see: > https://www.w3.org/2020/Process-20200915/#Consensus > > =========================================== > NEXT STEPS > Transition Request Following a Working Group Decision to Deprecate > > * In the case where this Call for Consensus results in a decision to > deprecate, the Chairs plan to request approval from the W3C Director > to deprecate the Note (including review of any Formal Objections). > > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> > https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 16 August 2021 14:34:25 UTC