- From: Susan Pandy <susanpandy@discover.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:18:25 +0000
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Web Payments Working Group <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Support the proposal -----Original Message----- From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 5:19 PM To: Web Payments Working Group <public-payments-wg@w3.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Call for Consensus to Publish Secure Payment Confirmation as a First Public Working Draft - RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 19 AUGUST CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants, This is a Call for Consensus to publish the following specification as a First Public Working Draft: Secure Payment Confirmation (SPC) https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://w3c.github.io/secure-payment-confirmation/__;!!MjXRb4uW6x5k!UkAbJqnjQW-Mx_Y8djk8jxYB6kJe0uNfZXXAZnNAKa_X5LMWjTSQelE8wDYaXOIBWQ$ Publication as a First Public Working Draft does NOT indicate that the document is complete or represents Working Group consensus. PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 19 August 2021 (14h00 UTC). For example, if you support the proposal, respond to this list with "1. Support the proposal.” We thank the editors for preparing this document. For the co-Chairs, Ian Jacobs =========================================== PROPOSAL That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director approve publication of Secure Payment Confirmation as a First Public Working Draft on the Recommendation Track. Please indicate one of the following in your response: 1. Support the proposal. 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even if suggested changes are not taken into account. 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal unless the changes are taken into account. 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale). 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group. 6. Abstain. =========================================== FORMAL OBJECTIONS * If you wish your LACK of support to publish to be conveyed to the Director and reviewed, please include the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" in your response and be sure to include substantive arguments or rationale. * The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore they typically require significant time and effort to address. Therefore, please limit any Formal Objections to issues related to the scope of these documents rather than technical content where the Working Group has not yet made a decision. * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection. * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that would address the concern and increase consensus to publish. For more information, see: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/2020/Process-20200915/*Consensus__;Iw!!MjXRb4uW6x5k!UkAbJqnjQW-Mx_Y8djk8jxYB6kJe0uNfZXXAZnNAKa_X5LMWjTSQelE8wDaKYeqz-Q$ =========================================== NEXT STEPS Transition Request Following a Working Group Decision to Publish * In the case where this Call for Consensus results in a decision to publish, the Chairs plan to request approval from the W3C Director to publish a First Public Working Draft (including review of any Formal Objections). -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/__;!!MjXRb4uW6x5k!UkAbJqnjQW-Mx_Y8djk8jxYB6kJe0uNfZXXAZnNAKa_X5LMWjTSQelE8wDYax-sHpw$ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Wednesday, 11 August 2021 17:26:29 UTC