Re: Call for Consensus to Request Formal Review of WPWG Charter - Review Requested by 8 November

Yubico supports the proposal (Option 1)

--

John Fontana

Solutions Analyst | Yubico <http://www.yubico.com/>
Skype: j_fontana



On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:51 AM Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
>
> The Web Payments Working Group's charter [1] expires 31 December 2019. We
> discussed rechartering during TPAC [2] and reviewed the draft charter at
> our 31 October teleconference [3].
>
> This is a Call for Consensus to request that the W3C Director submit the
> following charter for formal review by the W3C Membership:
> https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201910.html
>
> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 8 November 2019 (10am ET).
>
> NOTES:
>
> * One goal of this review is for your organization to begin to look at the
> scope section of the charter. We would like to reduce the likelihood
> organizations raising scope-related concerns during the formal Advisory
> Committee review, expected to begin later in November.
>
> * If the Member review process has not been completed before the end of
> 2019, I expect W3C to extend the current Working Group charter through the
> review period.
>
> For the co-Chairs,
> Ian Jacobs
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201803.html
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2019/09/15-wpwg-minutes.html#item14
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2019/10/31-wpwg-minutes.html
>
> =========
> PROPOSAL
>
> That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director submit
> this revised Web Payments Working Group charter for formal review by the
> W3C Membership:
>  https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201910.html
>
> Here is a diff from the current charter:
>  https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201910-diff.html
>
> For more background on the (proposed) scheduling of the Payment Request
> 1.0 Proposed Recommendation, see:
>
> https://www.w3.org/blog/wpwg/2019/10/28/the-evolution-of-payment-request-api/
>
> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
>
> 1. Support the proposal.
>
> 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even if suggested
> changes are not taken into account.
>
> 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal unless the
> changes are taken into account.
>
> 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
>
> 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group.
>
> 6. Abstain.
>
> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
>
> If there is strong consensus by 8 November 2019 (10am ET) for the
> proposal, it will carry.
>
> ==========================
> Formal Objections
>
> * If you wish your LACK of support to publish to be conveyed to the
> Director and reviewed, please include the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" in your
> response and be sure to include substantive arguments or rationale. The W3C
> Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore they typically
> require significant time and effort to address.
>
> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection.
>
> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
> individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that would
> address the concern and increase consensus to publish.
>
> For more information, see:
> https://www.w3.org/2019/Process-20190301/#Consensus
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447
>
>
>
>
>
>