- From: Krystian Czesak <krystian@shopify.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 10:36:24 -0400
- To: Roy McElmurry <rvm4@fb.com>
- Cc: Rouslan Solomakhin <rouslan@google.com>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Web Payments Working Group <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ4_1zLhoFSB8XwSCsW3ZDrBiW9N5saqsL=dZxULrD7rHmWEPA@mail.gmail.com>
Shopify supports and is very excited by the proposal! Krystian Czesak Technical Lead of Payments On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:14 AM Roy McElmurry <rvm4@fb.com> wrote: > 1 - support the proposal > ------------------------------ > *From:* Rouslan Solomakhin <rouslan@google.com> > *Sent:* Friday, March 15, 2019 6:07 AM > *To:* Ian Jacobs > *Cc:* Web Payments Working Group > *Subject:* Re: Call for Consensus to Publish Two Candidate > Recommendations - RESPONSE REQUESTED by 25 March 2019 > > Google: > > 1. Support the proposal. > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:16 PM Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > >> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants, >> >> This is a Call for Consensus to publish the following specifications as >> revised Candidate Recommendations: >> >> Payment Request API >> >> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/payment-request/768128f2bd94e022a9810eff7e60fee7fa13db30/index.html >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__raw.githack.com_w3c_payment-2Drequest_768128f2bd94e022a9810eff7e60fee7fa13db30_index.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=tXBGx0tWRjAj_vRS8ntQhQ&m=6Hq7ZmRSRv85RmyJWMbj-33JJAjiYP735l5xkVZjM9s&s=nYq0Gl3dBLN78e3v70BGAUeYAJjU2KCszXuImj8Uvis&e=> >> >> Payment Method Identifiers >> >> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/payment-method-id/146c22f045185e3f4c00944d1abcaf895e8116aa/index.html >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__raw.githack.com_w3c_payment-2Dmethod-2Did_146c22f045185e3f4c00944d1abcaf895e8116aa_index.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=tXBGx0tWRjAj_vRS8ntQhQ&m=6Hq7ZmRSRv85RmyJWMbj-33JJAjiYP735l5xkVZjM9s&s=boxL8VIDmdgKjeWZJjQCaYxHlQou4f6FSfYV7mEs2eU&e=> >> >> We would like to thank the editors for preparing these documents. >> >> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 25 March 2019 (10am ET). >> >> Note: We also anticipate publishing Basic Card [1] as a Working Group >> Note along with these Candidate Recommendations. >> >> For the co-Chairs, >> Ian Jacobs >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/payment-method-basic-card/ >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_TR_payment-2Dmethod-2Dbasic-2Dcard_&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=tXBGx0tWRjAj_vRS8ntQhQ&m=6Hq7ZmRSRv85RmyJWMbj-33JJAjiYP735l5xkVZjM9s&s=oAED_SJjR2s9JzNvNmAXvjqonR5YQrQJzveOnOskpvY&e=> >> >> ========= >> PROPOSAL >> >> That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director approve >> publication of Payment Request API and Payment Method Identifiers as >> Candidate Recommendations. >> >> Please indicate one of the following in your response: >> >> 1. Support the proposal. >> >> 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even if suggested >> changes are not taken into account. >> >> 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal unless the >> changes are taken into account. >> >> 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale). >> >> 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group. >> >> 6. Abstain. >> >> We invite you to include rationale in your response. >> >> If there is strong consensus by 25 March 2019 (10am ET) for the proposal, >> it will carry. >> >> ========================== >> CHANGES >> >> In a 5 February message we documented the primary changes to Payment >> Request since it was published as a Candidate Recommendation on 9 July 2018: >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2019Feb/0003 >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.w3.org_Archives_Public_public-2Dpayments-2Dwg_2019Feb_0003&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=tXBGx0tWRjAj_vRS8ntQhQ&m=6Hq7ZmRSRv85RmyJWMbj-33JJAjiYP735l5xkVZjM9s&s=pcKAa-s7ZausUtNXDWw8tnzp6NBx5et3jXsWKNFpM3A&e=> >> >> In addition to those changes we made a number of changes based on reviews >> that resulted from outreach to the Privacy Interest Group in February and >> March: >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2019Mar/0007 >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.w3.org_Archives_Public_public-2Dpayments-2Dwg_2019Mar_0007&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=tXBGx0tWRjAj_vRS8ntQhQ&m=6Hq7ZmRSRv85RmyJWMbj-33JJAjiYP735l5xkVZjM9s&s=HmA9cg5a6cEbcSf5P7r0cRNhuMrfKjzYyb1z_TRppao&e=> >> >> History of changes to Payment Request API: >> https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/commits/gh-pages >> >> Note: The "diff" file for changes to Payment Request API between July >> 2018 and March 2019 was too complex to be considered useful as part of the >> review materials. >> >> There have been only editorial changes since the 14 September 2017 >> Candidate Recommendation of Payment Method Identifiers. >> >> History of changes to Payment Method Identifiers: >> https://github.com/w3c/payment-method-id/commits/gh-pages >> >> ========================== >> FORMAL OBJECTIONS >> >> * If you wish your LACK of support to publish to be conveyed to the >> Director and reviewed, please include the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" >> in your response and be sure to include substantive arguments or >> rationale. The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and >> therefore they typically require significant time and effort to >> address. >> >> * We request that any Formal Objections be limited to changes made to >> Payment Request API since the 9 July 2018 draft: >> https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-payment-request-20180830/ >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_TR_2018_CR-2Dpayment-2Drequest-2D20180830_&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=tXBGx0tWRjAj_vRS8ntQhQ&m=6Hq7ZmRSRv85RmyJWMbj-33JJAjiYP735l5xkVZjM9s&s=JA_CGhKBtJIep6P83F_WMeyCHx1etZF4yP_1QPIAwDA&e=> >> >> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection. >> >> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the >> individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that >> would address the concern and increase consensus to publish. >> >> For more information, see: >> https://www.w3.org/2019/Process-20190301/#Consensus >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2019_Process-2D20190301_-23Consensus&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=tXBGx0tWRjAj_vRS8ntQhQ&m=6Hq7ZmRSRv85RmyJWMbj-33JJAjiYP735l5xkVZjM9s&s=Eh6kd3leF9iWO_Utu5Sv_N8I-VsMkiUAH9zRugXzXO4&e=> >> >> =========================== >> NEXT STEPS >> Transition Request Following a Working Group Decision to Publish >> >> * In the case where this Call for Consensus results in a decision to >> publish, the Chairs will request approval from the W3C Director to >> publish Candidate Recommendations (including review of any Formal >> Objections). >> >> * Sam Weiler has indicated [2] that he wishes to see a new feature >> added to version 1 of Payment Request API. We are handling this >> request as a Formal Objection to discuss with the W3C Director. >> >> [2] >> https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/842#issuecomment-469379019 >> >> -- >> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> >> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_People_Jacobs_&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=tXBGx0tWRjAj_vRS8ntQhQ&m=6Hq7ZmRSRv85RmyJWMbj-33JJAjiYP735l5xkVZjM9s&s=zO0c3SazhgSweUzEyh8LVAISQZmBwEWDKRR3862FBfc&e=> >> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >> >> >> >> >> >>
Received on Friday, 15 March 2019 14:37:48 UTC