W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > November 2017

Re: Call for Consensus to Publish Payment Method Manifest as a First Public Working Draft - RESPONSE REQUESTED

From: Zach Koch <zkoch@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:30:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOsZg64uF70gO2e8JaHYt7BC97jaVqn4iG9ByLpbtu6bh2pytQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Cc: Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Google supports the proposal.

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:22 AM Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
>
> At the TPAC face-to-face meeting there we discussed [1] issuing a
> Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish Payment Method Manifest as a
> First Public Working Draft.
>
> This is a Call for Consensus to publish:
>
>  Payment Method Manifest
>  https://w3c.github.io/payment-method-manifest/
>
>  Source
>
> https://github.com/w3c/payment-method-manifest/commit/471fe365d6660a5499cda7c1ba83e19984a1d085
>
> We would like to thank the editors for preparing this document. Note: we
> will adjust the publication
> date; 22 December is just a placeholder.
>
> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 6 December 2017 (10am ET).
>
> For the co-Chairs,
> Ian Jacobs
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/11/07-wpwg-minutes.html#item01
>
> =========
> PROPOSAL
>
> That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director approve
> the
> above specification as a First Public Working Draft on the Recommendation
> Track.
>
> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
>
>  1. Support the proposal.
>
>  2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even
>      if suggested changes are not taken into account.
>
>  3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal
>      unless the changes are taken into account.
>
>  4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
>
>  5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group.
>
>  6. Abstain.
>
> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
>
> If there is strong consensus by 6 December 2017 (10am ET) for the
> proposal, it will carry.
>
> ====================
> REMINDERS ABOUT NOTES, CONSENSUS, AND FORMAL OBJECTIONS
>
> * Publication as a First Public Working Draft does NOT indicate that a
> document
>   is complete or represents Working Group consensus.
>
> * In case of a decision to publish, the Chairs will request approval from
> the W3C
>   Director to publish a First Public Working Draft. In this case, if you
> wish your LACK
>   of support to publish to be conveyed to the Director and reviewed,
> please include
>   the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" [2] in your response and be sure to include
>   substantive arguments or rationale.
>
> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection [2].
>
> * The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore
>   they typically require significant time and effort to
>   address. Therefore, please limit any Formal Objections to issues
>   related to the scope of these documents rather than technical
>   content where the Working Group has not yet made a decision.
>
> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
>   individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that
>   would address the concern and increase consensus to publish.
>
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#Consensus
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 <(718)%20260-9447>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 27 November 2017 22:31:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:27 UTC