- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:16:12 -0500
- To: public-payments-wg@w3.org
On 11/15/2017 09:46 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > I'm supportive on the proviso that the spec is "gutted" (see [1], > for example). -1, publishing a gutted NOTE for work that we want to incubate seems pointless. Also, I question whether W3C publishing documents that effectively state "Nothing to see here" is useful. Alternate proposal: 1. Create a Web Commerce CG. 2. Hand the HTTP API spec over to them. 3. Redirect the TR space link to the ED in the WCCG. If that fails to garner consensus, do the gutted note pointing to the ED HTTP API spec in the WCCG. You can go here to support the creation of the Web Commerce Community Group (search for Web Commerce): https://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/ -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The State of W3C Web Payments in 2017 http://manu.sporny.org/2017/w3c-web-payments/
Received on Friday, 17 November 2017 15:16:38 UTC