Re: [w3c/webpayments] Finer points of integration with Web App Manifest (#225)

I've updated the [design doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1izV4uC-tiRJG3JLooqY3YRLU22tYOsLTNq0P_InPJeE/edit#heading=h.ze0cittirx52) according to the explainer and will work on churning out a web platform spec together with @domenic.

Personally, I'm not fully convinced that we need the `"meta"` section or `"meta_"` prefix. Can anyone elaborate on why that's better than adding `"version"` and `"sha256_cert_fingerprints"` directly into the dictionaries of `"related_applications"`?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/225#issuecomment-290120260

Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2017 15:08:51 UTC