- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:25:45 +0200
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2017 17:26:18 UTC
Hey Manu, Thanks for this. Assuming that all of the major vendors are going to implement PR API soon what would be the value of the polyfill? Are you suggesting it could add payment apps functionality where that is not available? Adrian On 9 March 2017 at 18:49, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > > > On Mar 9, 2017, at 10:35 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > wrote: > > > > On 03/09/2017 11:02 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie wrote: > >> As raised on the call today, it would be useful to get insight into > >> the state of any implementations of the payment apps spec. > > > > Digital Bazaar has a Digital Wallet that implements Verifiable Claims > > where we'd like to implement Payment Apps. We've been hobbled by the > > lack of a polyfill, what's the status of the PaymentRequest and > > PaymentApps polyfill? > > Hi Manu, > > I don’t know the state of a polyfill. > > The Payment App Api is still changing and I expect to have an update for > the WPWG > by FTF meeting time based on recent discussions (which Dave Longley has > been part of). > > Ian > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> > https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2017 17:26:18 UTC