- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 22:27:21 -0600
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Cc: Adam Roach <abr@mozilla.com>, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@ripple.com>, Jason Normore <jason.normore@shopify.com>, Jake Archibald <jakearchibald@google.com>, Marcos Caceres <mcaceres@mozilla.com>, Tommy Thorsen <tommyt@opera.com>, Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
> On Jan 23, 2017, at 10:23 PM, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com> wrote: > > On January 24, 2017 at 9:30:20 AM, Adam Roach (abr@mozilla.com) wrote: >> There are a lot of words here, but when I look closely, I see a very >> small number of issues here that Marcos is raising. On close inspection, >> it seems to me that these can be fixed in the current spec with fairly >> minor changes. > > I guess, as the existing proposal is pretty thin. However, there are > parts that require a significant rework... and there are parts that I > hold strongly that need to be elevated to the TAG for resolution. > > The spec is also unnecessarily verbose - so after all is said and > done, there won't be much of the original left because I'm literally > proposing to change ~95% of it. The verbosity has been intentional. We have been trying to communicate a model to people, not all of whom read WebIDL. Earlier versions of the spec said “This section is likely temporary” so we may in fact chop out a bunch of it or move it to another document. But we’ve been using it for communications of design choices and model. I would not want to throw it out just yet, but I am open to pruning it once we go to FPWD. Ian -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 04:27:33 UTC