Minutes [Was: [Agenda] 4 January Payments Apps Task Force Call]

Hi all,

Minutes from today’s call:
  https://www.w3.org/2017/01/04-apps-minutes.html

Next call is 10 January at 10:00 ET.

Thank you,

Ian

> On Jan 3, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Participants in the payments app task force,
> 
> Happy new year! We meet 4 January at 9am ET. Draft agenda below.
> Please let me know if there are other topics you would like to
> discuss.
> 
> NEXT meeting (note day / time change): 10 January, 10:00 ET.
> 
> Previous meeting 14 December:
> https://www.w3.org/2016/12/14-apps-minutes
> 
> WebEx:
> https://www.w3.org/2016/08/payment-apps-tf.ics
> 
> Ian
> 
> ========
> Developer call
> 
> Conor is organizing the next payment app developer call:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2017Jan/0000.html
> 
> Please let me know if 12 January works for you!
> 
> ========
> Issue 63: Should payment apps implement payment method-specific filters?
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/63
> 
> There is support from Rouslan, AdrianHB, Dave Longley, and Ian for
> AdamR's proposal (with some minor changes, e.g., sequence of
> dictionaries returned and some editorial tweaks).
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/pull/76
> 
> PROPOSED: To adopt this proposal into the specification taking into
> account 14 December discussion:
> https://www.w3.org/2016/12/14-apps-minutes.html#item01
> 
> ========
> Issue 73: Need to specify behavior for Clients.openWindow #73
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/73
> 
> Please review Ian's edits to section 10.3 for inclusion:
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/pull/78/commits/855790ae19152678a2f8f1695b1563ccb84fbd2e
> 
> Based on 14 December discussion:
> https://www.w3.org/2016/12/14-apps-minutes.html#item02
> 
> ========
> Issue 74: Fleshing out Recommended payment apps
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/74
> 
> See Rouslan's and Ian's notes in the issue. Would someone
> like to offer to review the text in the spec and propose
> changes?
> 
> ========
> Planning for FPWD
> 
> We resolved to request a call for consensus to advance Payment App API
> to FPWD at the end of this month. What do we want to have accomplished
> by then?
> 
> ========
> Issue 48: Payment app identifier to payment app manifest filename mapping
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/48
> 
> Relates to PMI issue 19; we should discuss that one first:
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers/issues/19
> 
> See also from Adrian:
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/48#issuecomment-261786242
> 
> ========
> Other issues
> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
> 
> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447