W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > December 2017

Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should the WPWG develop a cryptocurrency payment method specification (#232)

From: Carlos Arturo Quiroga <cquiroga@co.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:55:22 -0500
To: w3c/webpayments <reply+00f16b1cfcfe710c12b51bbf139449ad7b4daecd2182e67192cf000000011648e61b92a16>
Cc: Comment <comment@noreply.github.com>, webpayments <public-payments-wg@w3.org>, w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>, notifications@github.com
Message-Id: <OFED47FA35.E9A5B990-ON052581F7.006D2EAA-052581F7.006D709E@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Hi Chris

Did you know if there are some documents or point of view about "Lightning"
integration with money payment based networks?

Best Regards

Carlos Arturo Quiroga Quiroga.



From:	Christian Decker <notifications@github.com>
To:	w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Cc:	webpayments <public-payments-wg@w3.org>, Comment
            <comment@noreply.github.com>
Date:	12/13/2017 08:02 AM
Subject:	Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should the WPWG develop a cryptocurrency
            payment method specification (#232)



One thing to note here is that Lightning and similar networks already
natively support in-network currency exchanges, e.g., having a payment
start in one currency and the recipient receiving another currency.


—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.









graycol.gif
(image/gif attachment: graycol.gif)

17601560.gif
(image/gif attachment: 17601560.gif)

Received on Friday, 15 December 2017 19:55:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 15 December 2017 19:55:59 UTC