RE: Call for Consensus on Publishing Web Payments Overview 1.0 as a Working Group Note - RESPONSE REQUESTED

NACS votes 'yes' to publish the document at a WG Note.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 3:54 PM
> To: Web Payments Working Group
> Subject: Call for Consensus on Publishing Web Payments Overview 1.0 as a
> Working Group Note - RESPONSE REQUESTED
> 
> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
> 
> At the F2F in Lisbon there was support [1] for issuing a Call for Consensus
> (CfC) to publish the following as a Working Group Note:
> 
>  Web Payments Overview 1.0
>  https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-overview/NOTE/2016-09-30/
> 
> We would like to thank the editors for preparing this document.
> 
> This is a Call for Consensus to publish it as a Working Group Note.
> 
> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 7 October 2016 (1pm ET).
> 
> For the co-Chairs,
> Ian Jacobs
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/09/20-wpwg-minutes#item06
> 
> =========
> PROPOSAL
> 
> Request that the W3C Director approve the following for publication as a
> Working Group Note:
> 
>  Web Payments Overview 1.0
>  https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-overview/NOTE/2016-09-30/
> 
> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
> 
>  1. Support the proposal.
> 
>  2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even
>      if suggested changes are not taken into account.
> 
>  3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal
>      unless the changes are taken into account.
> 
>  4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
> 
>  5. Support the consensus of the WPWG.
> 
>  6. Abstain.
> 
> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
> 
> If there is strong consensus by 7 October 2016 (1pm ET) for the proposal, it
> will carry.
> 
> ====================
> REMINDERS ABOUT NOTES, CONSENSUS, AND FORMAL OBJECTIONS
> 
> * Publication as a Working Group Note does NOT indicate that a document
>   is complete or represents Working Group consensus.
> 
> * In case of a decision to publish, the Chairs will request approval  to publish
> a Working Group Note. In this case, if you wish your LACK  of support to
> publish to be conveyed to the W3C Director and  reviewed, please include
> the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" [2] in your  response and be sure to
> include substantive arguments or rationale.
> 
> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection [2].
> 
> * The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore  they
> typically require significant time and effort to  address. Therefore, please
> limit any Formal Objections to issues  related to the scope of these
> documents rather than technical  content where the Working Group has not
> yet made a decision.
> 
> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
>  individual(s) who made the Formal Objection to see whether there are
> changes that would address the concern and increase consensus to  publish.
> 
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#Consensus
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 13:22:03 UTC